Dark Knight Dramaturgy

A Bay Area Theater Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Literary Management’

Opening the shop, weeding the garden, and a little music.

Posted by Dark Knight Dramaturg on January 31, 2009

Everyday I think of the future, looking towards June 14th, the day when our lease is up and Rachel can I move out of the unfortunate two-bedroom living arrangement we find ourselves in. It’s sad to me that at a time when so much is bringing me joy–being engaged, loving my job, making new amazing friends, exploring this new and wacky city, being in conversation with so many brilliant theater people here and in Chicago, having two cute cats, living in a country with an articulate and respected President–the one thing that is not happy is where I come home to. We lived with my buddy Travis back in St. Louis and it worked out great; then I think we spoiled ourselves by living alone in Chicago. It’s hard to readjust to living with someone again. I’m looking forward to a time when I can come home from a ridiculously busy week at work (like this last one, just as a totally random and not foreshadowing-towards-the-body-of-this-post example) to an apartment devoid of the kind of tension that can only be created when cohabitants are totally incompatible.

Yesterday A.C.T. went live with selling back issues of Words on Plays online. We’ve sold back issues before, but usually how it happened was that somebody would call up the box office and say, “Hey, I saw that you did Hedda Gabler a few years ago. You got one of those study guide things,” and they would process it over there. A couple months ago, we restructured this so the orders would come to me. We had one since we made the switch, and that had actually been an order we’ve had since August that was just sitting around until somebody decided who was going to take care of it. Our webmaster has been wanting to take the business online, so she and I worked out the procedure and then last Thursday I spent 3 hours in archives–the basement of a building adjacent to our theater–cutting open boxes of stored Words on Plays to see what we actually had to offer. Sadly, we’ve recycled a good many of them over the years because we don’t have a lot of space; but as many as could survive survived. Then our webmaster worked out the kinks, and pushed a button.

Suddenly it’s as if I am a business owner.

I sold my first Words on Plays back issues today, the one for our production of Blackbird, to a woman who lives in Ohio. It made me gitty. I love these books. I believe in them. When things slow down, I’m going to work on pushing them on theater departments to see if there is an interest in working them into theater culture studies curriculums as a way to teach the production side of plays, which so often are just treated as texts or literature.

Later (like 10 minute later) I found a copy of our current Words on Plays, for our upcoming production of Souvenir, in the bathroom by the toilet. A humbling juxtaposition to be sure, but at least it meant one of the students took it out of his mailbox, presumably with the intention of reading it while on the crapper…right? I mean, we’re always well stocked on toilet paper…

Also this week, my artistic director and dramaturg and I finally sat down to have the long hard talk about what our literary team (I cannot really call it a staff, and I really can’t call it a department) is about. What should we be reading when none of us carry the title of literary manager and all of us have tremendous responsibilities in other areas? The result was unsurprising, but also liberating. We are pulling it in, tightening around our mission statement, celebrating what we are good at doing and admitting what we are not. And 76 scripts on my shelf (I cataloged them on Tuesday) will mostly disappear on Monday. Then, without that crippling display, it will be easier to read what is left.

In other news, Rachel and I saw Adele with some friends last night at the Warfield and good freaking lord:

She was amazing. And yes this is from that concert. And no I did not make the video. Like I would know how to make a fricking video? I’m proud I learned how steal it from youtube for you.

Posted in Blog | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Hulk Smash: Needlessly inflammatory response emails.

Posted by Dark Knight Dramaturg on November 17, 2008

Oh me, oh my. What a Monday it has been. My Artistic Director apparently did a radio interview recently, causing an influx of submissions. Unfortunately, our submission policy is rather strict because we do not have a literary manager, so the majority of my responses were simply, “Thank you for your interest. Send it through your agent.”

Sometimes this response is not kindly received. I understand the frustrations of the vicious need-a-production-to-get-an-agent / need-an-agent-to-get-a production cycle, but, playwrights, keep your rage in check!

The following is an email thread from today that was so rude that I just had to circulate it around the office. We had a good baffled laugh. Playwrights don’t usually blacklist themselves so blatantly. I realize that it was not necessarily meant for my eyes: the use of third person seems to suggest that this particular playwright was attempting to vent to a friend or colleague. So the lesson here–in this age of email communication–always be sure to distinguish between the “forward” command and the “return” command!

From:
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:23 AM
To: Dan Rubin
Subject:

To whom it may concern,
I would be grateful if you could advise me of your submission policies regarding
our new musical. . .

From: drubin@act-sf.org
To:
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:59:22 -0800
Subject: RE:

Dear Mr.

Writers are urged to refer to A.C.T.’s production history for the types of plays A.C.T. produces, which emphasize powerful ideas expressed in muscular language. A.C.T. values theatricality, complexity, and richness and the immediate, visceral, and intellectual contact among writers, performers, and audiences that exists only in the theater.
A.C.T does not accept unsolicited scripts for consideration. Any writer with representation should submit his or her play through a literary agent. Submissions will also be accepted if accompanied by a letter of recommendation by a theater professional (i.e., an artistic director or literary manager at a professional theater), preferably one who is familiar with our organization.
This information can also be found on our website: http://www.act-sf.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_opps_scripts

Sincerely,
Dan Rubin

From:
To: Dan Rubin <drubin@act-sf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:51:11 -0800
Subject:

Looking at their past prductions I can see what he means by
muscular language.

Cat on a hot tin roof
Christmas Carol (mm…..Scrooge the ultimate Charles Atlas)
Sweeney Todd
High Society (for fuck sake)
Travels with my Aunt (double for fuck sake)

All just oozing with muscular fuck-all

From: drubin@act-sf.org
To
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:14:09 -0800
Subject: RE:

Dear Mr. —

I wish you the best of luck finding a theater that shares your aesthetic opinion. Clearly, we are not it.

Sincerely,
Dan Rubin

From:
To: Dan Rubin <drubin@act-sf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:21:11 -0800
Subject:

I think we can count this one as a miss.
Anyway it’s in San Francisco!!!

Needless to say, we are not planning on working with this gentleman, whether he sends his musical through an agent or not.

Posted in Blog | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Iraq War: the stage play

Posted by Dark Knight Dramaturg on October 11, 2008

Would you go to the theater to see a play about the Iraq War? And I do not mean hypothetically: I mean, if I told you that there is a show about the Iraq war opening this weekend, would you go? Oh, I guess that is still hypothetical. I guess I meant…I don’t know what I meant.

What I am trying to say is that I probably would not, for the same reason I didn’t have a glimmer of interest in seeing Stop-Loss (that recent movie with Ryan Phillippe): I don’t want to pay money to think more about what I think about when I read the New York Times or Slate.com or watch the news or when I listen to NPR or tune into these ridiculous debates or catch snippets from the Republican’s terrifying pep-rallies. I am all for learning about the world through entertainment, but I fear that all the entertainment of any show having to do with the war would be sucked out by the very fact of what it is.

The problem is I just read a really pretty good play about the Iraq War, and I’m starting to hate the rejection letter I am forming: I really like the play but I don’t think anyone will touch it right now. My regret is not so much professional as it is personal: professionally speaking, I am relieved that I could simply say (and truthfully so) that this is not the kind of theater my organization is interested in doing. But my personal confession is that this is not the kind of theater I want to see, despite all of the play’s many strong elements.

Maybe this will change. Maybe it is just too soon. Or maybe a play set in 2004 Iraq is already irrelevant and will not be relevant again until we can see it as a piece of the whole puzzle. Maybe it will come out in stride the next time we go to war, just like Vietnam plays are coming out now. Maybe we are only ready to learn about the mistakes of the last war when we are on to the next one.

Posted in Blog | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.